Challenge / AI for Good

A good intention does not remove the need to test harm, bias and failure.

Teams propose a bounded use of AI, examine who is affected and test whether a simpler non-AI approach may serve the need better.

The challenge should follow, not replace, learning about data, models and evaluation.
OPENQUESTION
01 / Question02 / Understand03 / Build04 / Verify
01
BIAA / PROBLEM

Begin with people and context

Teams define the need, stakeholders and decision being supported before selecting a model or tool. The challenge rewards problem clarity rather than novelty alone.

02
BIAA / AUDIT

Audit data and failure

The evidence pack identifies data origin, missing perspectives, likely errors, privacy risks and the role of human review. Sensitive or high-impact use cases should be excluded from classroom implementation.

03
BIAA / ALTERNATIVE

Compare an AI and non-AI route

A rules-based, manual or educational intervention may be safer and more effective. Teams explain why AI is—or is not—justified and how the choice will be monitored.

BIAA / NEXT STEP

Build AI foundations

The challenge should follow, not replace, learning about data, models and evaluation.

Build AI foundations